Re: GPL for documentation ?

[Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@math.umd.edu>]

Anthony DeRobertis wrote:

> That is not a copyright notice, at least in the US. Title 17, Sec. 
> 401(b) gives the form of a notice fairly clearly: The symbol ©, the word 
> "copyright", or the abbreviation "copr."; the year of the first 
> publication of the work; and the name of the owner of the copyright owner.

How's this: 

   This document is Copyright 2004 by its contributors as defined
   in the section titled Authors. This document is released under
   the terms ...

Cheers,
-- 
Daniel Carrera          | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today!  | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org   |