Re: GPL for documentation ?
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> This document is Copyright 2004 its contributors as defined in
> the section titled AUTHORS. This document is released under the
> terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later
> (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html), or under the terms of
> the Creative Commons Attribution License, version 2.0 or later
> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), at the option of
> any part receiving it.
s/part/party/ [possibly consider just using 'at your option' or
whatever the precise language is from the GNU GPL recommended
copyright statement.]
Don Armstrong
--
[Panama, 1989. The U.S. government called it "Operation Just Cause".]
I think they misspelled this. Shouldn't it be "Operation Just 'Cause"?
-- TekPolitik http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=59669&cid=5664907
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: