On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:07:47AM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote: > > > For this reason, also, the usual suggestions won't help us. > > > > That doesn't make any sense. Why are you limited to this ridiculous > > pair of licenses? > > Because OpenOffice.org is very slow at approving anything. Getting > anything changed is difficult and takes time. Before, the only license > allowed for documentation was the PDL. Recently, we approved the CC-BY. I > think that the CC-BY is better than the PDL, so I want to take it. But you can approve a mangled variation on CC-BY, if you pretend that it's really the same thing? So just 'clarify' it into the MIT license... -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature