On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:49:12 -0500 Daniel Carrera wrote:
> This is how we, at OOoAuthors, interpret the Creative Commons
> Attribution license, used for our work:
Are you, as a copyright holder, considering to use a CC license?
I would recommend you to choose a clearly DFSG-free and urge your
fellows to do the same.
Believe me, it is far better than choosing a poor license and trying to
fix it with various additional permissions and "clarifications".
The usual suggestions are:
if you want copyleft
--------------------
* GNU GPL v2 http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.html
if you don't want copyleft
--------------------------
* Expat (a.k.a. MIT) http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
* X11 (a.k.a. MIT) http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html
* 2-clause BSD http://www.gnu.org/licenses/info/BSD_2Clause.html
Note that all these suggested licenses are GPL-compatible.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpxhwkeqhGH6.pgp
Description: PGP signature