[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Legal Status of VCG



Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Also, VCG 1.30 (the obfuscated source) contains code which is Copyright
Bob Corbett and Richard Stallman and which is licensed under the GPL
version 1 or later[2]. Because the code is (at least with the default
makefile) copied into the executable, you must distribute *the entire
work* under the terms of the GPL version 1 or later. Failing to do so
violates Mr. Corbett's and Mr. Stallman's copyright.

Just a minor point: You suggest that distributing it under GPL 2, or
"GPL 2 or later", would be a copyright violation.  I do not think that
this is the case.  The choice of license is for the user.  If the user
decides to accept only GPL 2, and no other version, then she may
redistribute it under that version.  This is not actually related to
acceptance of other versions by the user, but in case of limited
acceptance it is clear that the user may not even release it under a
different version, as the license must be accepted to allow redistribution.

Thanks,
Bas

--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: