On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:16:44 +0100 Måns Rullgård wrote:
> No, for a photograph the source is the actual physical object you've
> made a picture of, so a photograph can never be free.
No, it's not. The actual physical object is not the preferred form for
making modifications to the work (i.e. the photograph): it's the
preferred form for recreating a similar work from scratch.
> Either this, or
> a photograph should be considered as source.
Source code is the preferred form for modification.
In the case of a photograph, if the digital camera stores pictures in
JPEG format, you must start from that. It won't necessarily be your
preferred form for making modifications to the work, but it may be.
>
> In your case, your best bet would probably be to provide the
> photograph without the text, or (even better) provide the image in a
> more advanced format (e.g. XCF) with the photograph and text in
> different layers.
In the case of a photograph with a text over it, preferred form for
modification will probably be a layered image format: then that format
is the source code form.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpcpR_uwFUxr.pgp
Description: PGP signature