Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:11:44 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050302051144.GQ24181@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <4222773B.4030408@verizon.net>
- References: <20050225202547.GJ27159@zewt.org> <20050225204732.GA22117@squee.verizon.net> <20050225211250.GB9071@andromeda> <20050225212307.GB22117@squee.verizon.net> <20050225213345.GA9727@andromeda> <20050227095013.GE9897@mails.so.argh.org> <20050227095013.GE9897@mails.so.argh.org> <20050227174554.GF1351@xieana.donarmstrong.org> <E1D5YxW-0007qN-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <4222773B.4030408@verizon.net>
* Josh Triplett (josh.trip@verizon.net) [050228 02:45]:
> We do need some ability to determine if we have real source code
> available; "preferred form for modification" seems like a
> well-established definition, and far better than the alternatives.
The DFSG doesn't give any specific definition - so, anyone is free to
pick up their favourite ones.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: