Ben Johnson wrote: >>Maybe debian-x, maybe debian-devel or maybe you need > > a new list. > > Ok, debian-wankers, got it. If some people feel the > topic is so absurd, why do they waste their time > answering rudely ? I really don't know the answer to that question. I don't think MJ Ray was answering rudely there, but it is pretty clear that Marco d'Itri was with the debian-wankers remark. debian-legal has picked up a handful of people who seem to find it important to reply to every other thread with an attack on debian-legal, on the legitimacy thereof, on the recent GR regarding non-programs and the DFSG, or on anyone who doesn't support reading the DFSG as a checklist. Perhaps it's a milestone: we've become a sufficiently well-established forum to have picked up regular trolls. :) Please don't let a few people spoil your outlook on debian-legal as a whole. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature