Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> No, it doesn't. The lone JPEG is only non-free if the lossless version
> is what the original author would use to make a modification to the
> JPEG. If, for example, the original author threw out the lossless
> version immediately on making the JPEG, that's strong evidence it's not
> needed.
Not necessarily. It might be that at the time the original author had no
intention of any future modifications at all.
Reply to: