On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:59:16 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > That being said, you're still looking at this from the wrong > angle. We're here[1] to preserve our freedom to modify and distribute > modified software, not to sacrifice useful freedoms to include > anything in Debian. Exactly! :) The clear separation between Free-and-self-contained (i.e. main) and other (outside of main) software is one of the best features of Debian. It should be preserved as much as possible. > > While we should tie everything we can back to specific clauses and > interpretations of the DFSG, there's no reason to allow software that > is clearly non-free into Debian simply because it artfully avoids the > letter of the DFSG. Yes, I definitely agree. -- Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday. ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp55QAodRRt8.pgp
Description: PGP signature