Re: License of Open Solaris CDDL

To: <juhtolv@iki.fi>, <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: License of Open Solaris CDDL
From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:44:12 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] E1CtcE8-0006yc-00@pipe.localnet>
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:40:10 +0100 <3qHvY-3ga-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <3qHvY-3ga-19@gated-at.bofh.it>

When you contacted debian-legal about this licence last month, the
general opinion seemed to be that each case needed checking.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00002.html

I think it is unhelpful of you:
* not to remind us that you asked about this licence before,
* not to find out what changed between draft and final versions,
* not to tell us what software under CDDL you intend to package.

While debian-legal spends a lot of time on licences, it's not infinite, so
I find unhelpful repeat questioners annoying. Please try to help us too.
Even one of the three would have been good.

-- 
MJR/slef

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: License of Open Solaris CDDL
  - From: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@cc.jyu.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses (was ' Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license')
Next by Date: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Previous by thread: License of Open Solaris CDDL
Next by thread: Re: License of Open Solaris CDDL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread