debian-legal Jan 2005 by date
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 3
[
next page
]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Jan 01
Re: LCC and blobs
Raul Miller
Re: LCC and blobs
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: Using "debian extended xterminal (dext)" as name for a project.
Decklin Foster
Re: LCC and blobs
Henning Makholm
Re: LCC and blobs
Hamish Moffatt
Mozilla and Trademarks
Gervase Markham
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Alexander Sack
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Gervase Markham
And at night, the flaming foxes come...
Joel Aelwyn
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Joel Aelwyn
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Gervase Markham
Re: LCC and blobs
Raul Miller
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Raul Miller
Re: LCC and blobs
Henning Makholm
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Henning Makholm
Jan 02
Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
Steve Langasek
Re: LCC and blobs
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Joel Aelwyn
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Francesco Poli
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Francesco Poli
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Francesco Poli
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Francesco Poli
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Don Armstrong
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Andrew Suffield
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Andrew Suffield
Strange restrictions
Andrew Suffield
Re: Strange restrictions
Dave Harding
Bug#288233: Possible license issues
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: Strange restrictions
Raul Miller
Re: Strange restrictions
Gervase Markham
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Strange restrictions
Joel Aelwyn
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Joel Aelwyn
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Joel Aelwyn
Re: Bug#288233: Possible license issues
Josh Triplett
Re: Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Bug#288233: Possible license issues
Bart Warmerdam
Jan 03
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks
Eric Dorland
Re: Strange restrictions
Andrew Suffield
Re: LCC and blobs
Henning Makholm
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Henning Makholm
[ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian]
Micah Anderson
Re: [ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian]
Henning Makholm
Re: [ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian]
Micah Anderson
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Josh Triplett
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: [ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian]
Henning Makholm
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Francesco Poli
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Francesco Poli
Jan 04
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: LCC and blobs
Darren Salt
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Joel Aelwyn
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: Bug#288429: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
Re: Bug#288429: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free
Andreas Barth
Re: LCC and blobs
Matthew Garrett
Re: LCC and blobs
Darren Salt
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Hypothetical situation to chew on
Scott James Remnant
Re: LCC and blobs
Darren Salt
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Glenn Maynard
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Francesco Poli
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Francesco Poli
Jan 05
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Matthew Garrett
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Alexander Sack
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ?
Brian Masinick
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Nathanael Nerode
Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible?
Al Stone
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Glenn Maynard
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Josh Triplett
Re: Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible?
Matthew Garrett
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Matthew Garrett
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Glenn Maynard
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Josh Triplett
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Josh Triplett
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Matthew Palmer
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Josh Triplett
Re: LCC and blobs
Tollef Fog Heen
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ?
Gervase Markham
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Gervase Markham
Fax NÃO enviada para ''
Faxination
Re: Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible?
Al Stone
Re: Mozilla name suggestions
Christian Höltje
phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Fabio Tranchitella
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Don Armstrong
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Andreas Barth
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ?
Henning Makholm
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Henning Makholm
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Andrew Suffield
Jan 06
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Lewis Jardine
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Francesco Poli
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Francesco Poli
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Josh Triplett
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Josh Triplett
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Josh Triplett
Re: Trademarks: what is the line?
MJ Ray
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
More mmcache concerns
Elizabeth Fong
Re: LCC and blobs
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: LCC and blobs
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: LCC and blobs
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Iassen Pramatarov
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Raul Miller
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Batist Paklons
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: More mmcache concerns
Andrew Suffield
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Francesco Poli
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Francesco Poli
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Francesco Poli
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Matthew Palmer
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Don Armstrong
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Matthew Garrett
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Francesco Poli
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Matthew Garrett
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: LCC and blobs
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: LCC and blobs
Matthew Garrett
Re: LCC and blobs
Michael Poole
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: LCC and blobs
Michael Poole
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: More mmcache concerns
Florian Weimer
Re: More mmcache concerns
Joel Aelwyn
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
AROS License DFSG ok?
Gürkan Sengün
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: More mmcache concerns
Florian Weimer
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Florian Weimer
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Michael Poole
Re: More mmcache concerns
Jonathan Oxer
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Florian Weimer
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Michael Poole
Re: LCC and blobs
Marco d'Itri
Jan 07
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: LCC and blobs
Michael Poole
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Raul Miller
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Josh Triplett
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Henning Makholm
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Matthew Palmer
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: LCC and blobs
Ken Arromdee
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Henning Makholm
Re: LCC and blobs
Raul Miller
Re: LCC and blobs
Michael Poole
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: LCC and blobs
Ken Arromdee
Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers
Matthias Klose
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Using the Term Debian, DWN 04Jan05 - www.debianshop.com
Andreas Brakoulias
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Florian Weimer
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Florian Weimer
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Florian Weimer
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Arnoud Engelfriet
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Florian Weimer
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Arnoud Engelfriet
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Florian Weimer
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Florian Weimer
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Glenn Maynard
Re: LCC and blobs
Luke Schierer
Question about GFDL
Bernhard R. Link
Re: LCC and blobs
Marco d'Itri
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Matthew Garrett
Re: LCC and blobs
Glenn Maynard
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Glenn Maynard
Jan 08
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Mike Olson
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
MJ Ray
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers
Josh Triplett
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: LCC and blobs
Michael K. Edwards
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Batist Paklons
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Question about GFDL
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Andrew Suffield
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Don Armstrong
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Raul Miller
Re: Non-free files in source packages?
Simon Josefsson
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Matthew Garrett
Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers
Matthias Klose
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Francesco Poli
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Josh Triplett
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Glenn Maynard
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Matthew Garrett
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Raul Miller
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Steve Langasek
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Glenn Maynard
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Andrew Suffield
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Raul Miller
Jan 09
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Steve Langasek
Re: LCC and blobs
Marco d'Itri
Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and blobs]
Don Armstrong
Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Bernhard R. Link
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Mark Brown
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Florian Weimer
More mmcache concerns
Fedor Zuev
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Francesco Poli
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Florian Weimer
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Francesco Poli
Re: More mmcache concerns
Elizabeth Fong
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Joey Hess
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Kurt Roeckx
Re: AROS License DFSG ok?
Henning Makholm
Jan 10
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Nick Phillips
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Nick Phillips
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Alexander Sack
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
ReRegarding iraf
Justin Pryzby
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Glenn Maynard
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Justin Pryzby
ITP: libncar-graphics -- scientific visualization suite from UCAR
Justin Pryzby
Re: Dealing with drivers that need firmware on the filesystem
Steve McIntyre
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Glenn Maynard
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Justin Pryzby
Re: Dealing with drivers that need firmware on the filesystem
Steve McIntyre
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Justin Pryzby
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Glenn Maynard
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Your Managers Don't Have Expertise They Have This.
Marty Acosta
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Gervase Markham
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Francesco Poli
why is graphviz package non-free?
Bjoern
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Francesco Poli
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Marco d'Itri
Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Aurelien Jarno
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Jan 11
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Aurelien Jarno
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Don Armstrong
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
William Ballard
Re: Bug#289764: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Aurelien Jarno
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Aurelien Jarno
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
William Ballard
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Aurelien Jarno
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Andrew Suffield
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Andrew Suffield
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files
Helen Faulkner
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files
Matthew Palmer
Are drawings of products trademark infringements?
William Ballard
Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements?
William Ballard
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements?
Raul Miller
Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements?
Michael K. Edwards
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: ReRegarding iraf
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Batist Paklons
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END]
Aurélien Jarno
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Nick Phillips
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Matthew Palmer
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Steve Langasek
Re: Request for IPR review
Branden Robinson
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Jacobo Tarrio
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
William Ballard
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END]
Glenn Maynard
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Glenn Maynard
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Michael Poole
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
David Nusinow
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Steve Langasek
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
William Ballard
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
David Nusinow
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Michael Poole
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Bernhard R. Link
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
William Ballard
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Michael Poole
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Andrew Suffield
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
William Ballard
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Raul Miller
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Brian Thomas Sniffen
cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
William Ballard
Jan 12
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
William Ballard
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Nick Phillips
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Matthew Palmer
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
William Ballard
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
Michael Poole
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
William Ballard
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Daniel Goldsmith
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2)
Evan Prodromou
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Claus Färber
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
William Ballard
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
Michael Poole
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark
Andrew Suffield
GPL and CPL/APL are NOT compatible (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe)
Mark Wielaard
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Florian Weimer
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Claus Färber
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Claus Färber
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Dalibor Topic
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael Koch
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical)
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Andrew Suffield
[gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
novalis@fsf.org via RT
[gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
David Turner
Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2)
Francesco Poli
Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files
Francesco Poli
Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
prozilla: Nonfree
Justin Pryzby
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Matthew Palmer
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Steve Langasek
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Josh Triplett
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Daniel Goldsmith
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Steve Langasek
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
Steve Langasek
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Josh Triplett
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED
Christopher Lawrence
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Matthew Palmer
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
David Schleef
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Steve Langasek
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Matthew Palmer
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free?
MJ Ray
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2)
Nathanael Nerode
Re: LCC and blobs
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Lewis Jardine
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Justin Pryzby
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Henning Makholm
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: prozilla: Nonfree
Brian Nelson
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Dalibor Topic
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael Poole
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Andrew Suffield
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Andrew Suffield
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Andrew Suffield
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical)
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Andrew Suffield
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael Poole
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Andrew Suffield
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael Poole
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael Poole
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Brian Thomas Sniffen
how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file
Jochen Voss
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: LCC and blobs
Josh Triplett
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Josh Triplett
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL
Henning Makholm
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file
Henning Makholm
GNU Classpath based execution environments (Was: Eclipse 3.0)
Mark Wielaard
Re: why is graphviz package non-free?
Henning Makholm
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file
Jochen Voss
The last update was on 08:28 GMT Wed Mar 09. There are 1053 messages. Page 1 of 3.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 3
[
next page
]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc