On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:59:31PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes: > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Alexander Sack: > >> > >> > Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > > >> >> They are not entirely unrelated. The DFSG explicitly mentions > >> >> mandatory renaming clauses in licenses, and deems them to be > >> >> DFSG-free. The Mozilla trademark license seems to be rather harmless > >> >> at that because they give permission to retain the command names. > >> > > >> > No, they don't. AFAICS, as soon as you do not use the community edition you have > >> > to change the package name *and* the command names. > >> > >> Uh-oh. And the community edition does not give permission to change > >> the list of root CAs. 8-( > > > > What sort of nonsense is that? What on earth are they trying to accomplish? > > About what Debian seeks to accomplish with the Official Logo: a seal > or mark indicating quality. But their root CAs are crap. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature