Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2)
Consider adding the following to the summary under "trademark restrictions":
Debian-legal has contacted Creative Commons about this issue, since it seems
to be trivial to fix, but has unfortunately received no response.
Perhaps also add the following to the summary:
We would really like to work with Creative Commons to make these two licenses
DFSG-free; we hope that Creative Commons will be willing to work with us.
After that, I think we should declare it official. And send a copy to
Creative Commons!
Anyone disagree?
Reply to: