debian-legal Nov 2004 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Raul Miller
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Marco d'Itri
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Raul Miller
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Marco d'Itri
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Raul Miller
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Marco d'Itri
Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
Raul Miller
Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program
Steve Langasek
Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program
Anthony W. Youngman
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program
Michael D. Crawford
Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-*
Marco d'Itri
GPL and command-line libraries
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Josselin Mouette
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Måns Rullgård
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Måns Rullgård
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Jonathan ILIAS
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Måns Rullgård
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Glenn Maynard
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Måns Rullgård
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Tollef Fog Heen
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Raul Miller
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Wouter Verhelst
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Frank Küster
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Andrew Suffield
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Henning Makholm
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Nathanael Nerode
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Lewis Jardine
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Måns Rullgård
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Raul Miller
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Måns Rullgård
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Andrew Suffield
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Henning Makholm
Re: GPL and command-line libraries
Andrew Suffield
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Glenn Maynard
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Adam McKenna
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Adam McKenna
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Francesco Poli
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Francesco Poli
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
John Cowan
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Don Armstrong
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Francesco Poli
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?
Andrew Suffield
[jcowan@reutershealth.com: Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?]
Glenn Maynard
Java Researchg License
Juhapekka Tolvanen
Re: Java Researchg License
Matthew Garrett
Re: Java Researchg License
Dalibor Topic
Open Profanity License
Juhapekka Tolvanen
Re: Open Profanity License
Raul Miller
Re: Open Profanity License
Florian Weimer
Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses?
Juhapekka Tolvanen
Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses?
Sebastian Feltel
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses?
MJ Ray
APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL
Francesco Poli
Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL
Josh Triplett
Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL
Francesco Poli
Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue
Isaac Clerencia
Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue
Don Armstrong
Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue
Henning Makholm
Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue
Anthony DeRobertis
<Possible follow-ups>
Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue
Isaac Clerencia
Re: Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue
Michael Poole
review of DK and IIM patent licenses
Daniel Quinlan
Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses
MJ Ray
Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses
Matthew Garrett
Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses
MJ Ray
Bug#280673: apt-howto: APT HOWTO is under a non-free license
Francesco Poli
Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL
Matthias Klose
Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL
Don Armstrong
turck-mmcache license violation?
Andres Salomon
Re: turck-mmcache license violation?
cascardo
Re: turck-mmcache license violation?
Glenn Maynard
Re: turck-mmcache license violation?
Francesco Poli
Re: turck-mmcache license violation?
Andres Salomon
zwiki copyright status
Bob McElrath
Re: zwiki copyright status
Michael Poole
Re: zwiki copyright status
Simon Michael
Re: zwiki copyright status
Glenn Maynard
Re: zwiki copyright status
Glenn Maynard
Re: zwiki copyright status
Bob McElrath
Re: zwiki copyright status
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: zwiki copyright status
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: zwiki copyright status
Arnoud Engelfriet
Re: zwiki copyright status
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: zwiki copyright status
Arnoud Engelfriet
Re: Bug#280864: turck-mmcache: linking against php4 violates license
Elizabeth Fong
portaudio license
Dave Cunningham
Re: portaudio license
Henning Makholm
Re: portaudio license
Glenn Maynard
Re: portaudio license
Dave Cunningham
Re: portaudio license
Glenn Maynard
Re: portaudio license
Dave Cunningham
Re: portaudio license
Glenn Maynard
Re: portaudio license
Henning Makholm
3D- C library
Aranzazu Bereciartua Perez
GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Henning Makholm
Re: GPL compatible license?
Henning Makholm
Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Andrew Suffield
Re: GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: GPL compatible license?
Martin Schulze
Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: GPL compatible license?
Matthew Garrett
Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: GPL compatible license?
Ken Arromdee
Re: GPL compatible license?
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Re: GPL compatible license?
Anthony DeRobertis
o'reilly
Christopher Priest
Re: o'reilly
Michael Poole
Re: o'reilly
Anthony W. Youngman
Audacity and portaudio
Matt Brubeck
Re: Audacity and portaudio
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Audacity and portaudio
Matt Brubeck
Re: Audacity and portaudio
Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Audacity and portaudio
Matt Brubeck
Home delivery Meds
Hope Helms
Post to gentoo-gwn@robin.gentoo.org denied
gentoo-gwn+owner
witch licence
Vincent, Robin
Weird notices in phpBB 2.0.11
Anthony DeRobertis
microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is
Jan Minar
Re: Bug#282667: microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is
Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Re: Bug#282667: microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is
Jan Minar
Re: Bug#282667: microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is
Alessandro Rubini
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Ben Pfaff
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Glenn Maynard
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Don Armstrong
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Ben Pfaff
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Marco d'Itri
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Don Armstrong
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)
Andrew Suffield
Request for IPR review
Mark Johnson
firmware : which license "less worse" available
Benoit Audouard
Re: firmware : which license "less worse" available
Marco d'Itri
kissfft
Paul Brossier
Re: kissfft
Josh Triplett
Re: kissfft
Glenn Maynard
Re: kissfft
Josh Triplett
Common-licenses [was: Re: kissfft]
Francesco Poli
Re: Common-licenses [was: Re: kissfft]
Josh Triplett
Re: Your NISH Application
NISH89
CDF License
Mark Hymers
Re: CDF License
Matthew Garrett
Re: CDF License
Mark Hymers
The last update was on 12:40 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 173 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc