Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies

[Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>]

moth@debian.org wrote:

>> >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:51:56AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> >> So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can
>> >> pretend it's not there? Which part of the policy or SC justifies this
>> >> theory?

>If I ignore something as a part of a system when that thing is outside
>that system, there doesn't need to be any pretending.
OK, then I have issues with the english language. Let's try again:

So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can
ignore it's running on your system? Which part of the policy or SC
justifies this theory?

-- 
ciao,
Marco