On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:28:59 -0400 Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Francesco Poli writes:
[...]
> > That's not enough for DFSG-freeness, IMHO: if I'm required to keep
> > the name "abiword" in every derivative work of abiword, I cannot
> > sanely choose a name for a derivative that is significantly
> > different (in scope, purpose, functionality and so forth) from the
> > original.
> >
> > That is a major restriction in modification and it seems to fail
> > DFSG#3.
>
> It's a smaller restriction on modification than a patch clause, and so
> DFSG-free.
Why?
I can change the name of the work using a patch...
P.S.: No need to Cc: (or To:) me, as I'm a debian-legal subscriber.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpKLsej0EhCM.pgp
Description: PGP signature