[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Open Software License v2.1



On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:17:08AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 02:43:48PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> On the other hand, lawsuits attempting to enforce "patents" on software
> >> *are* intrinsically bad for free software.
> > 
> > This argument says that since it's bad for nuclear power plant
> > technicians to enforce patents on software, the software should not be
> > permitted to be used in nuclear power plants. Therefore you are a gerbil.

<snip straw man>

The form of both is "Since <person> performs <action>, <person> shall
be punished by terminating their license". The claim was that this is
somehow acceptable.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: