[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: most liberal license



On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:41:50PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> If you want a public-domain-equivalent license, write something like this:
> 
> (Some credit goes to Anthony DeRobertis. I've been trying to refine 
> this; it would be nice to have a 'standard' one.  Ideally we'd get a 
> 'sounds good' from at least one common-law and at least one civil-law 
> lawyer.)
> 
> --
> I hereby grant to everyone (any person whatsoever) a perpetual, 
> irrevocable, royalty-free license to modify, use, copy, distribute, 
> perform, and/or sell this work (modified or unmodified); and to exercise 
> any other rights (present or future) regarding this work which are 
> exclusive to me (or my successors or heirs) under law, to the fullest 
> extent possible under the law.
> 
> It is my intent that this work be treated as if the work had entered the 
> public domain, or been ineligible for copyright.  The license grant 
> above is designed to acheive this goal in as many jurisdictions as 
> possible.  If it is possible, I dedicate this work to the public domain. 
>  If it is possible, I relinquish my copyright in the work.
> --

You need a no-warranty clause (and the most interesting thing to check
with a lawyer is whether that clause will hold).

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: