On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 01:48:31PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 05:25:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > I believe the change to section 10 of the licence is sufficient to address > > > the objection to that section in the original summary. Is there consensus > > > on this? > > > > No, the clause hasn't really changed. It's still non-free for all the > > same reasons. > > No, it has changed. Old clause: Any lawsuit claiming patent infringement revokes your license. New clause: Any lawsuit claiming patent infringement revokes your license. Nothing's changed here. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature