On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 10:03:31PM -0700, Ken Arromdee wrote: > On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > I find a decent smoke test for aggregation to be: > > > > Can I take these two packages on the same CD and split them apart > > again, such that they are no longer aggregated, and still use them? It's a smoke test, not a bright-line test. But still... > This definition suggests that all Emacs macros are derived from Emacs, Fairly likely. > that > all Perl scripts are derived from Perl, Difficult to say. Perhaps. Certainly some are (for example, anything involving XSUB) - but perl has two licenses, so that's not hugely interesting. > and of course that any document > written in Microsoft Word is derived from Word. I can use a word document without a copy of word, these days. There are at least half a dozen other things that can work with them. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature