Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence
> > http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html
> Yuck.
If I might reinterpret your comments a tad more abstractly, I take it
you're saying that the document exceeded the mandate of its title,
since it discusses free software license issues in general; and that
it has insufficient global structure. Is that right? These both seem
like reasonable points.
It does seem reasonable to try to address common Debian-relevant
license-related questions in one document, including both questions
about the DFSG itself and about the penumbra of license-related
issues. So I changed the title to try to make it a bit broader! Lack
of global structure is a problem, and I'd very welcome someone else
making a serious editing pass---especially one that tried to impose a
coherent global structure on beast.
--
Barak A. Pearlmutter <barak@cs.may.ie>
Hamilton Institute, NUI Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
http://www-bcl.cs.may.ie/~barak/
Reply to: