On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:30:04PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > [1] http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/legal.html#10.2 > > (Accusing Free Software programmers of "perverting" the license by doing > things they were clearly granted permission to do; that's wonderful.) Wasn't the force behind the license "re-interpreation" to stop people from distributing Pine with a maildir patch? --Adam -- Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>