Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
> > What do you find non-free in this ?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:07:36AM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> It compels me to grant upstream a right which upstream will not grant
> me. If that were symmetric, I would not object to this under DFSG 3.
Same condition exists with the GPL. [The GPL can be replaced by later
versions from upstream.]
Then again, I understand that some people object to the GPL, too.
--
Raul
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>