Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
* Andrew Suffield:
> Yes. That's the whole point of the NM process. If this were not true
> then it would be unnecessary. The following is an example of an
> unacceptable opinion for a Debian applicant:
>> 5a. The GNU Free Documentaion License (FDL) has been heavily discussed
>> on debian-legal recently. Read
>> http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html and
>> briefly explain how you feel about the including documents
>> licensed under the FDL in main and what consequences of this
>> position might be for Debian.
> Debian should ignore licenses and include everything in main.
It's too short to be a valid answer, IMHO, but there's a certain line
of thinking perfectly acceptable among DDs which would completely
justify such a hyperbolic comment.