Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-09 and 2004-08-15
This summary covers 9 August to 15 August 2004.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/maillist.html#00214
7 most active threads with over 4 posts:
Netatalk and OpenSSL licensing, over 20 posts, last post 12 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00181
Web application licenses, around 20 posts, last post 14 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00011
NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the3.08.1
release going into sarge., over 30 posts, last post 14 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00228
GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL, over 10 posts,
last post 11 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00279
Clarification of redistribution, under 10 posts, last post 11 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00252
Nmap license, under 10 posts, last post 10 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00214
Free & open DRM software, under 10 posts, last post 11 Aug
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/threads.html#00218
Bits author picks:
Sleepycat relicense documentation under the same DFSG terms as their
code, thank -legal participants for their input
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/msg00252.html
Should http://www.debian.co.jp sign a trademark use agreement?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/msg00251.html
Bugs in -legal's current approach to license summaries
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/08/msg00177.html
Please inform syntaxis@gmail.com and mjr@dsl.pipex.com of errors or
improvements.
--
Andrew Saunders
Reply to: