On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:35:03 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote:
> I strongly disagree that such clauses are non-free.
I still consider QPL 3b as non-free: I'm not allowed to redistribute
modifications under the same terms of the original software. At least
not to the initial developer. This, IMHO, violates DFSG 3.
See my previous message
Message-Id: <20040731215142.269506c9.frx@firenze.linux.it>
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01736.html)
and the subthread that followed.
Brian Thomas Sniffen is following the same line of reasoning now in this
thread.
--
| GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | $ fortune
Francesco | Key fingerprint = | Q: What is purple
Poli | C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 | and commutes?
| 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 | A: A boolean grape.
Attachment:
pgpMhHVD1zRlP.pgp
Description: PGP signature