Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

["Bernhard R. Link" <blink@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>]

* Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org> [040812 19:35]:
> How do you reconcile that particular example with DFSG 5 and 6?  If it
> were just "you may choose your rights from license X, Y or Z" and any
> of the choices were free, I would agree that the work is free, but if
> it were "BSD to teachers, GPL to everyone else", I would read that as
> discrimination.

Then throw the BSD away and allow only everyone to use the copies you
distribute under GPL. As long as it is real GPL (or something free)
and nothing requiring the additional execptions.

Otherwise it is always discrimination, as it always implicitly says:
"and full rights to every author for the part of the code he wrote".


Hochachtungsvoll,
  Bernhard R. Link

-- 
Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing
an editor and a MTA.