Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen writes:
> * Licenses like the QPL, which compel me to give somebody more rights
> to my work than I had to his, are not Free. They are not compatible
> with DFSG 3.
This is where you lose me. How is that incompatible with DFSG 3? If
the license says that Entity X gets extra rights (perhaps being the
author of the original software), what prevents Author Y from
releasing modifications under the same license terms ("Entity X gets
extra rights to modifications")?