On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:00:10PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Looks fine to me. On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:49:49PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Looks OK On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:34:10PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > It looks like a 2-clause BSD license. > It's perfectly fine and suitable for main. This is completely unacceptable. How is debian-legal to maintain the credibility of baseless and irrational assertions about how we constantly reject even obviously DFSG-free licenses if we, in fact, don't? You guys should have more sympathy for hysterical doomsayers with poor reading comprehension skills. They need to feel important, too. :-P -- G. Branden Robinson | It's like I have a shotgun in my Debian GNU/Linux | mouth, I've got my finger on the branden@debian.org | trigger, and I like the taste of http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | the gunmetal. -- Robert Downey, Jr.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature