On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:03:33PM +0000, Jim Marhaus wrote: > "Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License" > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/02/msg00229.html Clause 4 of the license posted at the start of this thread is, with the execption of whos names it protects, word-for-word identical. Am I missing something?