Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal.
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:45:17AM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> That is worrying, but I expect it's there to prevent dongleware. I
> don't see a way to prevent dongleware without also preventing Google
> -- really, what is a hundred thousand machine server farm and five
> years of data but a really, really big dongle?
I'm not sure if that's what they were trying for; it is talking about
source code, so it could be trying to prevent me from giving people
useless (e.g., obfuscated) source.
However, as written, it has problems.
Reply to: