Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: Choice of venue argumentation.
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: Choice of venue argumentation.
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 11:18:29 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040802151829.GC14051@bohr.local>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <410BD890.5060100@verizon.net>
- References: <20040723122548.GD12155@pegasos> <55af2a49c19d1b3965c29e7fe4b8faba@bouncing.localnet> <20040723150010.GA17428@pegasos> <874qnyzr4d.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> <20040723153224.GA17670@pegasos> <DDBA562E-E313-11D8-A8C9-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <410BD890.5060100@verizon.net>
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 10:36:16AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I believe that the legal systems of US states cooperate much more than
> those of different countries. Also, a dispute involving several states
> would probably be either escalated to federal court, or require you to
> appear in California.
Nah, normally it'd require me to file papers to have the case moved to
Virginia, which is where the alleged offence occured.
Reply to: