debian-legal Aug 2004 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Adam McKenna

Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 25
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Aug 26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 30
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 30
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 31

Adam Sampson

Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27

Aktivitetskalender

Re: Re: Failure Aug 06

Alan

Re: Successful transmission from Kayla Aug 16

Alisa E Moore

Remodel your kitchen! You can if you get a new low rate and cash... Aug 13

Andersen

Profile Status Aug 19

Andreas Barth

Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 06
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 17

Andres Salomon

Re: SRP Aug 02
Re: MySQL FOSS Exception Aug 02
Re: SRP Aug 03
[Fwd: Upgrade of MySQL FLOSS License Exception] Aug 10

Andrew Saunders

Re: the meaning of 'the same terms" in DFSG 3, and why the QPL fails it (was: An old question of EGE's) Aug 02
Re: Clarification of redistribution Aug 12
Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-09 and 2004-08-15 Aug 16

Andrew Suffield

Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: nmap license Aug 10
Re: derivatives in English law, was: nmap license Aug 11
Re: Clarification of redistribution Aug 11
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 20
Re: A short licence check Aug 22
Re: A short licence check Aug 22
Re: A short licence check Aug 22
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Microsoft :-) Sender-ID Licence Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-16 and 2004-08-22 Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 25

Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Quick(?) Questions on Choice of Law & Venue Aug 02
Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: Choice of venue argumentation. Aug 02
Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal. Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 03
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04
Re: acceptable copyright? Aug 04
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Aug 06

archive

Fantasy of Flight Email System has detected that you have attempted to send a prohibited email attachment. This attachment has been filtered and prohibited in reaching your intended recipient. (SYM:14541635202882633765) Aug 21

Barak Pearlmutter

Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Aug 28

Ben Pfaff

Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04

Bernhard R. Link

Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 10
Re: Web application licenses Aug 13
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 14
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 14
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 26
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 27
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 27

bert

updates Aug 23

Branden Robinson

Re: question: Mozilla relicensing progress Aug 02
Re: the meaning of 'the same terms" in DFSG 3, and why the QPL fails it (was: An old question of EGE's) Aug 02
Re: the meaning of 'the same terms" in DFSG 3, and why the QPL fails it (was: An old question of EGE's) Aug 02
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Aug 02
Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 02
Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 08
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 08
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 08
Re: Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 08
Re: acceptable copyright? Aug 08
Re: W3 software license Aug 08
Re: Quick(?) Questions on Choice of Law & Venue Aug 08
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 08
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 08
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 09
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 23
Re: the meaning of 'the same terms" in DFSG 3, and why the QPL fails it (was: An old question of EGE's) Aug 23
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 23
Re: W3 software license Aug 23
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 23
Re: the meaning of 'the same terms" in DFSG 3, and why the QPL fails it (was: An old question of EGE's) Aug 23

Brian M Hunt

Free & open DRM software Aug 10

Brian Nelson

Brian Thomas Sniffen

Re: Web application licenses Aug 02
Re: Free Debian logos? Aug 02
Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal. Aug 02
Re: Web application licenses Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Web application licenses Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Aug 06
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Web application licenses Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Free & open DRM software Aug 10
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 11
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: Web application licenses Aug 13
Re: Web application licenses Aug 13
Re: Web application licenses Aug 13
Re: Web application licenses Aug 14
Re: Web application licenses Aug 14
Re: Web application licenses Aug 14
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 15
Re: Web application licenses Aug 15
Re: Web application licenses Aug 16
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 16
Re: Web application licenses Aug 17
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 18
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 18
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: [SDL] Proposed wiki license Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 22
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License Aug 30
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 30
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 31
Re: Web application licenses Aug 31

Brooks

Re: Account Information at Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:18:50 -0600 Aug 21

Bruce Perens

Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 17
Re: [Spi-trademark] Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18
Re: [Spi-trademark] Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18

Christian Hammers

New MySQL "Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) Exception" licence.... (re #242449) Aug 09
Re: Bug#242449: fixed? not quite yet Aug 11
FYI: MySQL asking again for community comments (re #242449) Aug 14

Craig Small

Debian domain in Japan (Was: Please add us to debian CD vendors list) Aug 08

Daniel Stenberg

GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12

Daniel Stone

Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03

Dave O

Re: Bug#242449: fixed? not quite yet Aug 11

David Moreno Garza

[Fwd: Re: httping license issues] Aug 06

David Nusinow

Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 09
Re: periodic summaries, was: RPSL and DFSG ... Aug 09
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24

David Schleef

Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 17
Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 17
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 20
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27

debat

Re: *** VIRUS ALERT *** Mail Delivery (failure debat@maxifoot.fr) Aug 24

Don Armstrong

Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 21
Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 21

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: SRP Aug 02
Re: Web application licenses Aug 03
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 11
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 24
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 24
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Aug 26

evan

Helix Player under GPL (was Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance) Aug 06
Re: W3 software license Aug 09

Florian Weimer

Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 20
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24

Forrest Burr

your request Confirmation Aug 06

Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: New MySQL "Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) Exception" licence.... (re #242449) Aug 24

Francesco Poli

Freek Dijkstra

Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 10
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 10
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 13
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 13
Re: [Spi-trademark] Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18
Re: A short licence check Aug 22

Frieda Schneider

how cuold you do this to a firned? Aug 22

Fumitoshi UKAI

Re: Debian domain in Japan (Was: Please add us to debian CD vendors list) Aug 08

Gervase Markham

Mozilla relicensing progress Aug 07

Glenn Maynard

Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 02
Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 02
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 02
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Aug 02
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 03
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 03
Re: Web application licenses Aug 03
Re: Web application licenses Aug 03
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 04
Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 04
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 05
Re: Web application licenses Aug 06
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: nmap license Aug 10
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 10
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 10
Re: Web application licenses Aug 12
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 12
Re: Web application licenses Aug 14
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 17
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 17
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 18
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: [SDL] Proposed wiki license Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 20
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 21
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 22
Re: A short licence check Aug 22
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 22
Re: A short licence check Aug 22
Re: A short licence check Aug 22
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 23
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 23
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 23
[caniart.nicolas.no-spam@libertysurf.fr: Re: CeCILL again...] Aug 24
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: MontyLingua license Aug 24
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: CeCILL again... Aug 24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 25
Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 26
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 27
[gnu.org #209128] Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 27
Re: Answer Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility? Aug 28
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Aug 28

Hattie Carney

This weeks specials sedulous Aug 25

Humberto Massa

Re: Re: nmap license Aug 10
Re: nmap license Aug 10

Igor Stroh

A short licence check Aug 22
Re: A short licence check Aug 22

Isabella

Invitation Aug 01

Claus Färber

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 24

Jörgen Hägg

acceptable copyright? Aug 04

Måns Rullgård

Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19

ivan-debian

Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 24

Jacobo Tarrio

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: MontyLingua license Aug 24

Jannie Fritz

Re: little two-storey box except Aug 20

Jason Thomas

Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18

Jim Marhaus

Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02

Joachim Breitner

Re: advice regarding doom-engine licences Aug 10

Joel Baker

Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 02
Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Aug 03

Joe Moore

Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 05
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 10
Re: Free & open DRM software Aug 10
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 10
Re: Clarification of redistribution Aug 11
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: Choice-of-Venue is OK with the DFSG. Aug 19
Re: [SDL] Proposed wiki license Aug 23

Joe Wreschnig

Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 02
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 03
Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 04
Re: acceptable copyright? Aug 08
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: summaries bugs, was: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 09
Re: Conditions vs. (possibly inaccurate) notices (was Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 10
Re: Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 10
Re: Re: Conditions vs. (possibly inaccurate) notices (was Re: Pleasepass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 10
Re: Re: Conditions vs. (possibly inaccurate) notices (was Re: Pleasepass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 10

John Goerzen

Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18

Jonas Meurer

mysql license and python-mysqldb Aug 10
Re: New MySQL "Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) Exception" licence.... (re #242449) Aug 10

Jon Dowland

advice regarding doom-engine licences Aug 10
Re: advice regarding doom-engine licences Aug 10

Joseph

There are more good news Aug 02

Josh Triplett

Re: Free Debian logos? Aug 03
Re: Web application licenses Aug 03
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 04
[OT] Maintaining something in order to be a developer Aug 06
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Aug 06
Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 06
Re: Web application licenses Aug 06
Re: acceptable copyright? Aug 08
Re: Debian domain in Japan (Was: Please add us to debian CD vendors list) Aug 08
Re: W3 software license Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: Web application licenses Aug 12
Re: W3 software license Aug 12
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Free & open DRM software Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 13
Re: Web application licenses Aug 13
Re: Web application licenses Aug 13
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 19
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Aug 28
Re: Web application licenses Aug 31

Ken Arromdee

Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 12
Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 20

Lewis Jardine

Re: Web application licenses Aug 18
Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL Aug 19
Re: A short licence check Aug 22

Luis R. Rodriguez

Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18
Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18
Re: [Spi-trademark] Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 18
Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 19

Mahesh T. Pai

Marco d'Itri

Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Aug 02

Marco Franzen

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Aug 26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" Aug 26

Mark Brown

Re: periodic summaries, was: RPSL and DFSG ... Aug 07

Mark Hymers

GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License Aug 30
Re: GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License Aug 30

Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader

Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub Aug 19

Martin Schulze

Re: Debian domain in Japan (Was: Please add us to debian CD vendors list) Aug 10

Matthew Garrett

Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 02
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Aug 03
Re: acceptable copyright? Aug 04
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09
Re: Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Aug 09

The last update was on 06:17 GMT Sun Oct 11. There are 840 messages. Page 1 of 2.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc