Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> You could look at it that way. On the other hand, if I release my
>> GPLed code under 3(b) then anyone who receives it can pass on the offer
>> I gave them (under 3(c)). I am then obliged to pass on my modifications
>> directly to people who I never provided binaries to. Is distribution
>> under 3(b) and 3(c) non-free?
>If those were the only options, it was the loose consensus that that would
>not be free.
Really? Wow. That's insane.
Matthew Garrett | email@example.com