[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xinetd license possibly violates DFSG #4



On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:12:51AM -0500, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I do not consider this to "go much further than that". The intention is
> imho the one DFSG4 tries to carter for. The author wants:
> a) derivatives being detectable as such.
> b) derivatives have to keep out of xinetd's namespace. He wants to
> forbid a derivative being numbered as xinetd 2.3.15, taking away the
> official version number.

On what do you ground your statement of the author's intention?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    No executive devotes much effort to
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    proving himself wrong.
branden@debian.org                 |    -- Laurence J. Peter
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: