Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
* Brian T. Sniffen:
> That is, I owe two fees to the initial developer of the software.
> First, I give him a license to distribute my modifications in future
> versions of the software, and to use that code in non-free derivatives
> of the software. Second, if he asks for it I also supply a copy even
> if I have not distributed them to anyone. This is a fee as described
> by DFSG #1.
This argument *must* be flawed because the same argument can show that
*any* copyleft license violates DFSG #1, which clearly is not the case.
Reply to: