Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness
> > You should provide a more significant objection than "your modifications
> > have value".
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:26:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I don't think it's an "insigificant" objection.
The license prohibits any redistribution at all, and instead of focussing
on that, you are pushing a line of logic that seems to make the GPL
> > "Distribution of source", as required by the GPL, has value, so your
> > logic would this mean that the GPL is non-free.
> No, because modification is not distribution, and I cannot copyright my act
> of distribution.
You can't copyright gold, either.