Re: xinetd license possibly violates DFSG #4
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:12:51AM -0500, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I do not consider this to "go much further than that". The intention is
> imho the one DFSG4 tries to carter for. The author wants:
> a) derivatives being detectable as such.
> b) derivatives have to keep out of xinetd's namespace. He wants to
> forbid a derivative being numbered as xinetd 2.3.15, taking away the
> official version number.
If he wants that, the requirement needs to be waived if the work isn't
called 'xinetd'. That'd be DFSG-free.
Reply to: