[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: definitions of free



On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 17:57:57 -0400 Michael Poole wrote:

> The policy work involves the actual identification of freeness.
> DFSG-free is a (I believe strict) subset of OSI-free, and probably a
> superset of FSF-free.

I don't think that DFSG-free is a superset of FSF-free.
For non-programs there is no doubt, IMHO, (see GFDL, verbatim-copying,
...).
For programs, I don't know: I don't have the time now to scan the FSF
list of free program licenses and see if they include some that Debian
considers non-free.

[...]
> I see both the infrastructure and policy issues as being significant
> reasons to *not* identify packages as "FSF Free" or "OSI Free" or
> anything except "DFSG Free" (as in main vs non-free).

I agree: it would be too complicated.


-- 
             |  GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | You're compiling a program
  Francesco  |        Key fingerprint = | and, all of a sudden, boom!
     Poli    | C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 |         -- from APT HOWTO,
             | 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 |             version 1.8.0

Attachment: pgpOZ3cLo1YE9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: