debian-legal Jun 2004 by subject
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Re:
ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.p@MM (ED) found; an attachment has been quarantined
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0
Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant?
<AUTO> {MSEMEA#717-276}something for you
AWARD WINNING FINAL NOTIFICATION. VERY URGENT!!!
Banner Advertisements
Re: bereft lipton
Re: Bug#251026: It's coming..
Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main
Bug#254596: jftpgw: Several license problems
cc65 license check -- main or non-free?
Re: cc65 licensing
Re: cc65 licensing (was: cc65 license check -- main or non-free?)
chugging
Contracts and licenses
Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]
Creative Commons Attribution license element
DBD::InterBase licence
Re: DFSG#10 and the Open Source Initiative
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL]
dpANSI
Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free
Employment going back up they said
FAQ Improvements (was: license change for POSIX manpages)
Free Linux Kernel
[Fwd: Licence for Icons]
gens License Check - Non-free
historical question about fceu in contrib
How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with?
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with?
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package?
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package?
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package?
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package?
How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software?
Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable?
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term
Licence problems with psybnc
Licening ibwebadmin and JSRS
license change for POSIX manpages
Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ?
New powerful weightloss for you.
Nick Carter email auto-response - please read...
oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source
patent aspects, was: Summary Update: MPL ...
Powerful weightloss now available for you.
Powerful weightloss now available where you are.
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test
PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness])
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness])
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG#
The last update was on 06:15 GMT Sun Oct 04. There are 655 messages. Page 1 of 2.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
![[First Page]](/images/first.png){kind=small}
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png){kind=small}
