[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free



On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:20:54PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > > If the court is willing to take the licensor's word for 
> > > it, then couldn't the licensor sue me in Santa Clara even if I had
> > > never had anything to do with the software?
> > 
> > Yes, but you could then tell them and the court that they had to move the
> > suit to where you lived.  With this clause, you couldn't (unless the clause
> > was ruled to be unenforcable).
> 
> This is circular. A court has to decide from the facts of the case
> whether the clause is "enforceable". Which court decides that? That
> depends on whether the clause is "enforceable". So where do we start?

Law school.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: