[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: license change for POSIX manpages



On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:41:08PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Josh Triplett:
> 
> > Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Josh Triplett:
> >>>One other issue: does "and the nroff source is included" mean that if I
> >>>want to hand someone a printed copy of a manual page, I have to either
> >>>print the nroff source or supply it on an attached disk?  This seems
> >>>onerous for physical distribution.
> >> 
> >> This is what happens if you apply the GPL to documentation, and it
> >> seems to be considered acceptable.
> >
> > The GPL has an option for just providing an offer to provide source on
> > request.
> 
> "to give any third party", this fails the Desert Island (or some
> variant of it) test.

Nobody on a desert island can be requested to do anything.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: