Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element

[MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>]

On 2004-06-09 01:56:18 +0100 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> 
wrote:

> > 3) As for the trademark clause, I agree that the trademark 
> > requirement
> > is burdensome.
> This isn't supposed to be an actual part of the license, according to 
> the
> source code for the web page; [...]

I missed that. I'm not in the habit of reading licence page source 
codes in the normal run of things. Yes, it's not clear, as a cursory 
glance at copies of the CC licence suggests. I see some Nathanael 
Nerode pointed that out on cc-discuss in March... are we talking into 
a black hole, or do CC react to that list?

--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Help hack the EuroParl! http://mjr.towers.org.uk/proj/eurovote/