debian-legal Jun 2004 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Adam McKenna

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 05
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 06
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 07
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 07
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 08

Adam Warner

Re: dpANSI Jun 22
Re: dpANSI Jun 23

Alexander Cherepanov

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18

Andreas Barth

Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18

Andre Lehovich

license change for POSIX manpages Jun 08

Andrew Pollock

How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 10
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 10

Andrew Saunders

Re: Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Jun 20
Re: dpANSI Jun 22

Andrew Suffield

Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Jun 01
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Jun 01
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 03
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: XMMS in main? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 08
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 12
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 24
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 24
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 25
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 26
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Jul 01

Anthony DeRobertis

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 14
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 14
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 15
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 17
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 24
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29

Arnoud Engelfriet

Re: RFC: moving from BSD to GPL Jun 24
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30

Barak Pearlmutter

Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 08
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08
FAQ Improvements (was: license change for POSIX manpages) Jun 10
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 14
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 15

batist

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30

Benjamin Cutler

gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 20
cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 20
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 21
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 21
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 25
Re: cc65 licensing (was: cc65 license check -- main or non-free?) Jun 25
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25

Bernhard R. Link

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13

Billy Biggs

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21

Branden Robinson

Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 03
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 03
Re: DFSG#10 and the Open Source Initiative Jun 03
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 08
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 08
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 08
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 08
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 10
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 30
PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Jun 30
xinetd license possibly violates DFSG #4 Jun 30

Brian Nelson

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 24

Brian Thomas Sniffen

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 14
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 15
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 15
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 24
Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 28
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Jul 01

Caitlin Parrish

New powerful weightloss for you. Jun 12

Camm Maguire

dpANSI Jun 21
Re: dpANSI Jun 21
Re: dpANSI Jun 22

Carlo Wood

Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 04

carlpez carlos5

AWARD WINNING FINAL NOTIFICATION. VERY URGENT!!! Jun 29

Christine C. Raines

Powerful weightloss now available for you. Jun 06

Damyan Ivanov

DBD::InterBase licence Jun 15
Re: DBD::InterBase licence Jun 15

Dan Korostelev

Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19

Dave Howe

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18

David Schwartz

RE: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 19

Don Armstrong

Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 06
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30

DSAVOIDCI-PROXY001(Network Associates Anti-Virus - Mailbox Agent)

ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.p@MM (ED) found; an attachment has been quarantined Jun 06

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 28

Evan Prodromou

Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 12
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 12
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
historical question about fceu in contrib Jun 21
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27

Florian Weimer

Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11

Francesco Paolo Lovergine

Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12

Francesco P. Lovergine

RFC: moving from BSD to GPL Jun 24

Francesco Poli

You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 01
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 01
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 01
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 03
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 03
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 06
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 06
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 07
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 13
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 13
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 16
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 19
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 21
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 22
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 24
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 24
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 26
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 26
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 28
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 29
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 30

Frankie Fuller

Employment going back up they said Jun 04

Frank Lichtenheld

Re: Unterminated sentence at webwml/english/legal/licenses/dls-007-opl.wml Jun 28

Gary Gibbons

Re: Jun 20

Gerfried Fuchs

scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25

Glenn Maynard

Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Jun 01
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 02
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 03
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 03
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 03
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 07
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 10
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 10
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 10
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Jun 11
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30

Gustavo R. Montesino

Unterminated sentence at webwml/english/legal/licenses/dls-007-opl.wml Jun 21

Henning Makholm

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 04
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04

Humberto Massa

Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29

info

Banner Advertisements Jun 10

Frank Küster

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17

Måns Rullgård

Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: XMMS in main? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08

Jacobo Tarrio

Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10

.jareeN.

Free Linux Kernel Jun 27

J.B. Nicholson-Owens

Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21

jens persson

Re: scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25

Jeroen van Wolffelaar

oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07

Jerry Haltom

XMMS in main? Jun 05
Re: XMMS in main? Jun 09

Jim Marhaus

Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 08
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 25

Jimmy

chugging Jun 07

Joachim Breitner

Unfortunate Licence Mix Jun 14
Licence problems with psybnc Jun 14
Re: scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25

Joachim Reichel

Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Jun 03

Joe Moore

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30

Joe Nahmias

Re: historical question about fceu in contrib Jun 29

Joe Wreschnig

Josh Triplett

Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Jun 03
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 06
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Jun 14
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 15
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Jun 23
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 24
Re: scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 29
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Jun 30

Joshua Kwan

Re: Bug#251026: It's coming.. Jun 30

Kate Grady

New powerful weightloss for you. Jun 13

Ken Arromdee

Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 09
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23

Lewis Jardine

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29

Lex Spoon

Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 24
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 25
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29

Mahesh T. Pai

Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Jun 15
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: patent aspects, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 25

Marco Franzen

Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Jun 01
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 13
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 14
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 14
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 15

martin f krafft

Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 02

Matthew Palmer

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 01
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 07
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 21
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Jul 01

Matthew Wilcox

Matthieu Delahaye

Which license for a documentation? Jun 04

May Colvin

Re: bereft lipton Jun 25

mdpoole

Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25

Michael Poole

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 07
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 08
request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: RFC: moving from BSD to GPL Jun 24
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25

Microsoft MKB Info Nederland

<AUTO> {MSEMEA#717-276}something for you Jun 16

MJ Ray

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 01
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 01
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04

The last update was on 06:15 GMT Sun Oct 04. There are 655 messages. Page 1 of 2.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc