Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL]
* Francesco Poli (email@example.com) [040519 00:25]:
> I'm not quite happy with DFSG#10:
> I'd say that sort of information shouldn't belong in the DFSG: IMHO it
> would fit much better in informative pages such as
> What do you think?
If it's not a bug, then don't fix it. We have enough problems with
unnecessary changes to the SC, so please leave DFSG#10 alone.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C