Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:36:27PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>
>>Even worse, at some point this becomes a Lanham Act violation,
>>rendering the document undistributable.
>
> If a work uses trademarks illegally, we can't distribute that work.
>
> But that's not a DFSG issue.
>
But if you are forced to include certain text in modified documents, and
that text violates a trademark unless the document is unmodified, then
the work is DFSG-non-free.
- Josh Triplett
Reply to: