Re: please advise on proper documentation license
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:28:27PM -0500, Alex Roitman wrote:
> Now that I read the Draft Debian Position Statement put together on the
> page of Manoj Srivastava, I think we'd like to change the way our docs
> are licensed.
> What would the debain-legal people suggest we use for the documentation
> license instead of GFDL?
I think that Nathanael Nerode's page covers this better:
Basically, use the license you use for the program itself (which, if
I'm not mistaken, is the GPL in this case).