debian-legal Apr 2004 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
about licenses for 3D models
Auto-Responder (info@mecanicimport.com)
Re: bill
Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Re: Breaking News 56616
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-freefirmware
Bug#242281: Problem with mush's license
Bug#242895: drivers/usb/emi26_fw.h has a non-free license
Bug#244289: xball: Package includes non-free source code.
Re: CCPL-by
Collection of approved licences in the wiki
contracts vs. licenses, OSI, and Debian (was: The QPL licence)
Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & ..
Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amib oot & ..
Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & ..
Different classifications of non-free [Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free?]
DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0
Re: DRAFT for a GR proposal concerning the Sarge release
DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested
firmwares in the 2.4.25 Linux kernel (Debian sources)
Font source Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Forgent starts litigating JPEG...
Freedom at last
Re: Freepats
Get Cia:lis ES 7.5 Fast intimacy
GPL and scripting languages (here: python2.3-psycopg)
Re: GPL vs. OSL
Have some Xana#x and you will have a blast, we've got it here . no que.stions asked
Re: Here is the document
How might I convince my school not to use this product?
Is license text copyrightable? [was: Re: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?]
Automated Reply from candidat <candidat@www.pmebtp.com>
Norton AntiVirus hat einen Virus in einer von Ihnen gesendeten Nachricht ermittelt. Die infizierte Anlage wurde gelöscht.
Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?
I think it's great
License violation in "new" Plex86
lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL)
Mail delivery failure
[MailServer Notification] To Sender a virus was found and action taken.
Mamografii gratuite
Modifying an ISO
Re: more evil firmwares found
Re: mplayer
Re: New summary: Binary peripheral software
non-freeness of 4-clause BSD license (was: The QPL licence)
(no subject)
Notify about your e-mail account utilization.
Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
Online demonstration support against Software Patents?
Re: Open Publication License
[OT] Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
pasqua
Re: please release sarge instead of removing binary firmware
Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Postfach erloschen
Problematic Software Licenses
Problem with mush's license
psmisc and POSIX compliance
The purpose of debian-legal
The QPL licence
Question about DFSG and a THC project
reiser4 non-free?
Repost of the DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0
RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org
SEPL (Swiss Ephemeris Public License)
shrew
Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Squeak in Debian?
Stop feeling bad about yourself!!
Summary of the CC-by
Re: Summary wanted
Summary wanted (was: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?)
Template Numerical Toolkit (TNT) license
Treat your illness
Votre message pour ue01_200310 a ete rejete
Your Doctor say no? We will say yes! 79843
The last update was on 06:17 GMT Sun Oct 11. There are 450 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc