Hi debian-legal, I'd like to have your opinion about a GPL compatibility issue. Libcanlock has been ITP'ed (#204933) and the goal is to have slrn use it (#127901). However, slrn is GPL and libcanlock is made of several files : - one is BSD licensed - some are under the X11 license as found in http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html - one is taken from RFC 3174 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3174.html, license terms at the end). I don't like the wording of "derivative work that comment on...", I think it narrows the scope of what kind of derivative works are allowed. Thanks for your comments, Laurent.
Description: Digital signature